Friday, March 20, 2009
Pro Se Litigant v. 2nd Judicial DIstrict Court of Jackson County, Kansas
Jackson County, Kansas - Cheryl Nicol {maiden name Parrett} was recently going through a divorce action, and decided that her attorney was not doing enough to help her, so she terminated his assistance. She had decided she had enough and decided to get involved and do her case as a pro se litigant {acting as her own attorney} with a little help from outside group. She had discovered her former husband {Parrett} did not file a Domestic Financial Affidavit, in which was required pursuant to Kansas Supreme Court Rule {SCR 164}. He also testified he made over 55 thousand a year since 1999 and failed to file any taxes. The Honorable Nafziger had gave Cheryl both of the properties in question. The Attorney Cheryl Nicol had fired then placed a lien upon her property she was awarded, in which was a violation of violation of Kansas SCR 1.5 (f)(1). The Honorable Nafziger decided to reverse the decision without justifiable cause. Cheryl Nicol had decided to Appeal the decision. She is now in the Kansas Court of Appeals. The Kansas Court of Appeals was well familiar with this judge and has now removed him from the bench. If Attorneys go after judges for this they get disbarred. If Pro Se Litigants do this, only time will tell. Cheryl is currently waiting fro the Kansas Court of Appeals decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)